/page/2

Metamorphosis, a photographic project exploring our connection with frogs and other amphibians. Despite changed form, we are bound by the same fate of environment

Frogs from the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica! #frogs #animals #amphibians #photography #CostaRica

eyeyei:

“Skyline” by Robin Moore 
(via National Geographic)

eyeyei:

“Skyline” by Robin Moore 

(via National Geographic)

(Source: exerceyes)

February 2012 Desktop Wallpaper, Samburu Village, Kenya

February 2012 Desktop Wallpaper, Samburu Village, Kenya

The Art of Seeing
I just love it when people respond to one of my photographs with “Wow, you must have a nice camera”. That is exactly the message I am trying to convey.
OK, so maybe not. If the only reaction a photo evokes is “this guy  spends a lot on equipment!” then I have failed pretty miserably in any  form of artistic expression. And while I get enough positive  reinforcement from my photos to keep me going, I still get asked about  gear far more often than I get asked about technique or creative vision.  I have been trying to figure out why.
People love to have the biggest and the best. We like cars that can  go three times faster than we will ever drive them, and we like cameras  that produce images that can be blown up to the size of a house. Twenty  five megapixels you say? Great, I’ll take it. And I will admit it, I am a  sucker for that sugar rush of having a new toy to play with, and  salivate at the sight of a new canon L series lens.
But photography is a blend of science and art. With more emphasis on  the importance of gear than the importance of seeing, the art of  photography gets drowned in a sea of megapixels. We all want quick fixes  and immediate results. We want to improve our photography NOW, and the  best way to do that is to get an expensive camera and lenses longer than  your right arm, right?
I’m not so sure. For over two years I used an entry level DSLR and  shot jpegs. Post-processing was something you did to cheese and RAW  meant uncooked meat. Why would I want a “fast” lens when most of my  subjects weren’t moving? A professional-grade camera and expensive  lenses would have been wasted on me. The simplicity of a basic camera  and one lens forced my creativity. I really had to think about  composition and light. Without post-processing I had to get everything  right when I clicked the shutter. I tried to figure out what worked well  and what didn’t (mainly by doing the latter) and spent a lot of time  studying the kind of images I wanted to be taking. When I looked at a  scene I would ask myself “how would I paint this?”. It forced me to  think about what was really important in the composition – what was the  strongest way of seeing, as Edward Weston put it. It challenged me to  think about how I wanted to represent the scene or the subject rather  than simply lifting my camera to eye level and recording it as if to say  “I’ve been here”. I thought more about mood and emotion, about  composition and quality of light.
As my eye developed I started to feel the limitations of the camera  and lens I was using and my curiosity led me to invest in a wide angle  lens. A new world of creative opportunities was opened. I captured the  image above when the combination of scene, light and moment coincided  and it was the first image I had taken that I felt really captured the  mood of the moment. That lens was stuck on my camera for the next six  months. I went a bit bonkers with it.
And then came my first portfolio review with National Geographic  Natural History Photo Editor Kathy Moran: “you might want to go easy on  the wide angle”. I realized my obsession with the wide angle had closed  my mind to other, potentially more powerful, interpretations. This  challenged me to find new and different perspectives that did not rely  on the “wide angle effect”. I invested in a zoom lens and learned the  power of isolating and compressing elements of the landscape for more  abstract images. I learned the art of simplicity.
So, what’s my point again? I guess my point is that, while equipment  is of course important, while we all succumb to the allure of the nice  new camera with gazillion megapixels, the most powerful images are those  that resonate emotionally – and for now, at least, that is not  something the camera will do for you. It will tell you the “right”  exposure for a scene, but it won’t tell you the creatively correct  exposure for your interpretation of the scene. It won’t tell you what  lenses are right for your creative vision. Enjoy the journey of creative  discovery, hone your art through carefully crafted compositions,  experimentation and happy accidents, beware of the wide angle traps and  challenge yourself to see the world in different ways. And please don’t  ask me what kind of camera I use.

The Art of Seeing

I just love it when people respond to one of my photographs with “Wow, you must have a nice camera”. That is exactly the message I am trying to convey.

OK, so maybe not. If the only reaction a photo evokes is “this guy spends a lot on equipment!” then I have failed pretty miserably in any form of artistic expression. And while I get enough positive reinforcement from my photos to keep me going, I still get asked about gear far more often than I get asked about technique or creative vision. I have been trying to figure out why.

People love to have the biggest and the best. We like cars that can go three times faster than we will ever drive them, and we like cameras that produce images that can be blown up to the size of a house. Twenty five megapixels you say? Great, I’ll take it. And I will admit it, I am a sucker for that sugar rush of having a new toy to play with, and salivate at the sight of a new canon L series lens.

But photography is a blend of science and art. With more emphasis on the importance of gear than the importance of seeing, the art of photography gets drowned in a sea of megapixels. We all want quick fixes and immediate results. We want to improve our photography NOW, and the best way to do that is to get an expensive camera and lenses longer than your right arm, right?

I’m not so sure. For over two years I used an entry level DSLR and shot jpegs. Post-processing was something you did to cheese and RAW meant uncooked meat. Why would I want a “fast” lens when most of my subjects weren’t moving? A professional-grade camera and expensive lenses would have been wasted on me. The simplicity of a basic camera and one lens forced my creativity. I really had to think about composition and light. Without post-processing I had to get everything right when I clicked the shutter. I tried to figure out what worked well and what didn’t (mainly by doing the latter) and spent a lot of time studying the kind of images I wanted to be taking. When I looked at a scene I would ask myself “how would I paint this?”. It forced me to think about what was really important in the composition – what was the strongest way of seeing, as Edward Weston put it. It challenged me to think about how I wanted to represent the scene or the subject rather than simply lifting my camera to eye level and recording it as if to say “I’ve been here”. I thought more about mood and emotion, about composition and quality of light.

As my eye developed I started to feel the limitations of the camera and lens I was using and my curiosity led me to invest in a wide angle lens. A new world of creative opportunities was opened. I captured the image above when the combination of scene, light and moment coincided and it was the first image I had taken that I felt really captured the mood of the moment. That lens was stuck on my camera for the next six months. I went a bit bonkers with it.

And then came my first portfolio review with National Geographic Natural History Photo Editor Kathy Moran: “you might want to go easy on the wide angle”. I realized my obsession with the wide angle had closed my mind to other, potentially more powerful, interpretations. This challenged me to find new and different perspectives that did not rely on the “wide angle effect”. I invested in a zoom lens and learned the power of isolating and compressing elements of the landscape for more abstract images. I learned the art of simplicity.

So, what’s my point again? I guess my point is that, while equipment is of course important, while we all succumb to the allure of the nice new camera with gazillion megapixels, the most powerful images are those that resonate emotionally – and for now, at least, that is not something the camera will do for you. It will tell you the “right” exposure for a scene, but it won’t tell you the creatively correct exposure for your interpretation of the scene. It won’t tell you what lenses are right for your creative vision. Enjoy the journey of creative discovery, hone your art through carefully crafted compositions, experimentation and happy accidents, beware of the wide angle traps and challenge yourself to see the world in different ways. And please don’t ask me what kind of camera I use.

October 2011 Desktop Wallpaper to download!

October 2011 Desktop Wallpaper to download!

Plains Zebra in black and white, Tanzania. © Robin Moore
www.robindmoore.com

Plains Zebra in black and white, Tanzania. © Robin Moore

www.robindmoore.com

Metamorphosis, a photographic project exploring our connection with frogs and other amphibians. Despite changed form, we are bound by the same fate of environment

Frogs from the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica! #frogs #animals #amphibians #photography #CostaRica

eyeyei:

“Skyline” by Robin Moore 
(via National Geographic)

eyeyei:

“Skyline” by Robin Moore 

(via National Geographic)

(Source: exerceyes)

February 2012 Desktop Wallpaper, Samburu Village, Kenya

February 2012 Desktop Wallpaper, Samburu Village, Kenya

The Art of Seeing
I just love it when people respond to one of my photographs with “Wow, you must have a nice camera”. That is exactly the message I am trying to convey.
OK, so maybe not. If the only reaction a photo evokes is “this guy  spends a lot on equipment!” then I have failed pretty miserably in any  form of artistic expression. And while I get enough positive  reinforcement from my photos to keep me going, I still get asked about  gear far more often than I get asked about technique or creative vision.  I have been trying to figure out why.
People love to have the biggest and the best. We like cars that can  go three times faster than we will ever drive them, and we like cameras  that produce images that can be blown up to the size of a house. Twenty  five megapixels you say? Great, I’ll take it. And I will admit it, I am a  sucker for that sugar rush of having a new toy to play with, and  salivate at the sight of a new canon L series lens.
But photography is a blend of science and art. With more emphasis on  the importance of gear than the importance of seeing, the art of  photography gets drowned in a sea of megapixels. We all want quick fixes  and immediate results. We want to improve our photography NOW, and the  best way to do that is to get an expensive camera and lenses longer than  your right arm, right?
I’m not so sure. For over two years I used an entry level DSLR and  shot jpegs. Post-processing was something you did to cheese and RAW  meant uncooked meat. Why would I want a “fast” lens when most of my  subjects weren’t moving? A professional-grade camera and expensive  lenses would have been wasted on me. The simplicity of a basic camera  and one lens forced my creativity. I really had to think about  composition and light. Without post-processing I had to get everything  right when I clicked the shutter. I tried to figure out what worked well  and what didn’t (mainly by doing the latter) and spent a lot of time  studying the kind of images I wanted to be taking. When I looked at a  scene I would ask myself “how would I paint this?”. It forced me to  think about what was really important in the composition – what was the  strongest way of seeing, as Edward Weston put it. It challenged me to  think about how I wanted to represent the scene or the subject rather  than simply lifting my camera to eye level and recording it as if to say  “I’ve been here”. I thought more about mood and emotion, about  composition and quality of light.
As my eye developed I started to feel the limitations of the camera  and lens I was using and my curiosity led me to invest in a wide angle  lens. A new world of creative opportunities was opened. I captured the  image above when the combination of scene, light and moment coincided  and it was the first image I had taken that I felt really captured the  mood of the moment. That lens was stuck on my camera for the next six  months. I went a bit bonkers with it.
And then came my first portfolio review with National Geographic  Natural History Photo Editor Kathy Moran: “you might want to go easy on  the wide angle”. I realized my obsession with the wide angle had closed  my mind to other, potentially more powerful, interpretations. This  challenged me to find new and different perspectives that did not rely  on the “wide angle effect”. I invested in a zoom lens and learned the  power of isolating and compressing elements of the landscape for more  abstract images. I learned the art of simplicity.
So, what’s my point again? I guess my point is that, while equipment  is of course important, while we all succumb to the allure of the nice  new camera with gazillion megapixels, the most powerful images are those  that resonate emotionally – and for now, at least, that is not  something the camera will do for you. It will tell you the “right”  exposure for a scene, but it won’t tell you the creatively correct  exposure for your interpretation of the scene. It won’t tell you what  lenses are right for your creative vision. Enjoy the journey of creative  discovery, hone your art through carefully crafted compositions,  experimentation and happy accidents, beware of the wide angle traps and  challenge yourself to see the world in different ways. And please don’t  ask me what kind of camera I use.

The Art of Seeing

I just love it when people respond to one of my photographs with “Wow, you must have a nice camera”. That is exactly the message I am trying to convey.

OK, so maybe not. If the only reaction a photo evokes is “this guy spends a lot on equipment!” then I have failed pretty miserably in any form of artistic expression. And while I get enough positive reinforcement from my photos to keep me going, I still get asked about gear far more often than I get asked about technique or creative vision. I have been trying to figure out why.

People love to have the biggest and the best. We like cars that can go three times faster than we will ever drive them, and we like cameras that produce images that can be blown up to the size of a house. Twenty five megapixels you say? Great, I’ll take it. And I will admit it, I am a sucker for that sugar rush of having a new toy to play with, and salivate at the sight of a new canon L series lens.

But photography is a blend of science and art. With more emphasis on the importance of gear than the importance of seeing, the art of photography gets drowned in a sea of megapixels. We all want quick fixes and immediate results. We want to improve our photography NOW, and the best way to do that is to get an expensive camera and lenses longer than your right arm, right?

I’m not so sure. For over two years I used an entry level DSLR and shot jpegs. Post-processing was something you did to cheese and RAW meant uncooked meat. Why would I want a “fast” lens when most of my subjects weren’t moving? A professional-grade camera and expensive lenses would have been wasted on me. The simplicity of a basic camera and one lens forced my creativity. I really had to think about composition and light. Without post-processing I had to get everything right when I clicked the shutter. I tried to figure out what worked well and what didn’t (mainly by doing the latter) and spent a lot of time studying the kind of images I wanted to be taking. When I looked at a scene I would ask myself “how would I paint this?”. It forced me to think about what was really important in the composition – what was the strongest way of seeing, as Edward Weston put it. It challenged me to think about how I wanted to represent the scene or the subject rather than simply lifting my camera to eye level and recording it as if to say “I’ve been here”. I thought more about mood and emotion, about composition and quality of light.

As my eye developed I started to feel the limitations of the camera and lens I was using and my curiosity led me to invest in a wide angle lens. A new world of creative opportunities was opened. I captured the image above when the combination of scene, light and moment coincided and it was the first image I had taken that I felt really captured the mood of the moment. That lens was stuck on my camera for the next six months. I went a bit bonkers with it.

And then came my first portfolio review with National Geographic Natural History Photo Editor Kathy Moran: “you might want to go easy on the wide angle”. I realized my obsession with the wide angle had closed my mind to other, potentially more powerful, interpretations. This challenged me to find new and different perspectives that did not rely on the “wide angle effect”. I invested in a zoom lens and learned the power of isolating and compressing elements of the landscape for more abstract images. I learned the art of simplicity.

So, what’s my point again? I guess my point is that, while equipment is of course important, while we all succumb to the allure of the nice new camera with gazillion megapixels, the most powerful images are those that resonate emotionally – and for now, at least, that is not something the camera will do for you. It will tell you the “right” exposure for a scene, but it won’t tell you the creatively correct exposure for your interpretation of the scene. It won’t tell you what lenses are right for your creative vision. Enjoy the journey of creative discovery, hone your art through carefully crafted compositions, experimentation and happy accidents, beware of the wide angle traps and challenge yourself to see the world in different ways. And please don’t ask me what kind of camera I use.

Metamorphosis

Metamorphosis

October 2011 Desktop Wallpaper to download!

October 2011 Desktop Wallpaper to download!

Plains Zebra in black and white, Tanzania. © Robin Moore
www.robindmoore.com

Plains Zebra in black and white, Tanzania. © Robin Moore

www.robindmoore.com

About:

Scottish-born Robin Moore is an internationally acclaimed photographer and conservationist whose images paint a striking portrait of our relationship with the world around us. He is an Associate of the International League of Conservation Photographers and his photographs and stories have graced the pages of publications including National Geographic Traveler, the Telegraph Magazine and TIME for kids. He has received Awards from National Geographic, Nature’s Best, Photo District News and the International Conservation Photography Awards among others, and is represented by the National Geographic Image Collection. To see more of Robin’s work please visit www.robindmoore.com